Legal Opinion

Sudeikis v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 14, 1980No. 79-91PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti

The plaintiff, Anne Sudeikis, appeals from an order of the circuit court of Cook County dismissing her complaint for failure to state a cause of action on the motion of the defendants, the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Donald Walsh, Ernie Banks, Wallace D. Johnson, Lawrence Sucsy, and Terrill W. Hill. She argues on appeal that the trial court’s reliance on the parol evidence rule in dismissing her complaint was error. The defendants contend, both in their motion to dismiss and on appeal, that the complaint failed to state a cause of action because (1) the breach of duty allegation in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. George v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Nelson v. John B. Colegrove & Co. State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Mayer v. Illinois Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918
  4. In Re Estate of McCaffreyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  5. Fronek v. WroblewskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Main Bank of Chicago v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bruce Lippo, D/B/A "Walden-Woodfield Service Station," v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Pecora v. SzaboAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Susmano v. ASSOC. INTERNISTS OF CHICAGOAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Trapkus v. Edstrom's, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API