Legal Opinion

Henry v. Rice

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided October 27, 1947No. 5539PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULEN, District Judge.

Motion of plaintiff, Prince Henry, to remand this action to the state court is for ruling. The suit was originally commenced against Dr. Earl R. Rice and seeks to recover for personal injuries based upon alleged negligence of the defendant growing out of the falling of X-ray equipment in the defendant’s office upon plaintiff. Plaintiff and defendant in the original action are citizens of St. Louis, Missouri. In the state court defendant, Dr. Earl R. Rice, filed an answer denying plaintiff had a claim against him upon which relief could be granted and denied that he was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Torrence v. SheddSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Brooks v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Shainwald v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Habermel v. MongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  5. Consolidated Textile Corp. v. IsersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sequoyah Feed & Supply Co. v. RobinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1951
  2. Manternach v. Jones County Farm Service CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1957
  3. Westwood Development Co., Inc. And Dr. H. C. Hoisington v. Harvey v. Higley, Administrator of Veterans' AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Schoneweather v. L. F. Richardson, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1954
  5. Trullinger v. RosenblumDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API