State v. Flowers
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for menacing and criminal mischief in the second degree. ORS 163.190; ORS 164.354. Finding no merit in his several assignments of error, we affirm the substance of his appeal. However, we write to respond to the parties’ supplemental briefs, which address whether this case is affected by our holding in State v. Rudder, 133 Or App 174, 889 P2d 1367 (1995), now pending on reconsideration.
Defendant committed the offenses, which are both class A misdemeanors, in March 1993. At that time, the maximum fine for class A misdemeanors was $2,500, and district courts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. RudderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. GouveiaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jesse Javier Alvarado v. Jean HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. ZibulskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Harned v. AmsberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Wallett v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.