Legal Opinion

State v. Zibulsky

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 29, 2014No. 101134317; A149480PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HADLOCK, P J.

The state charged defendant with various crimes arising from her involvement in her elderly father’s financial affairs, including first-degree theft, first-degree criminal mistreatment, and identity theft. She appeals the resulting judgment of conviction, asserting that the trial court erred in denying her motions for a judgment of acquittal (M JOAs) on three of the identity-theft counts for which a jury ultimately convicted her. See ORS 165.800 (stating crime of identity theft). Two of those counts were premised on the state’s contention that defendant had unlawfully…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. BilsborrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. RennellsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RitterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. People v. BensenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  3. State v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API