Legal Opinion
State v. Colasuonno
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided May 19, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Judge.
This Opinion involves the combined motions of Carl Colasuonno, Robert Dailey, Sharon Miller, Sandra Halter and Charlotte Murphy [defendants] to dismiss the State’s informations 1 charging them with violations of 11 DeLC. § 1361.
Defendants Colasuonno, Miller, Halter and Murphy have been charged with violating 11 Del.C. § 1361(a)(2) in that they either presented or participated in an obscene performance in which live nude women engaged in masturbation or a simulation thereof. Defendant Dailey is charged with violating 11 Del.C. § 1361(a)(1) in that he knowingly provided the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richardson v. WileSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Disabatino v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 2002
- State v. General Chemical Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1988
- Stoltz v. Delaware Real Estate CommissionSuperior Court of Delaware · 1984