Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Wile

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 4, 1988PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

The United States District Court for the District of Delaware has certified two questions of law for this Court to consider. In the exercise of our discretion to hear questions for which there are urgent and important reasons for determination, we have decided to accept only one question. 1 The issue accepted is whether a business establishment which rents or sells x-rated video cassettes is an “adult entertainment establishment” as defined by 24 Del.C. § 1602.

The question certified by the District Court requires this Court to determine the scope of the phrase “adult…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ewing v. BeckSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Genuine Parts Co. v. CepecSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  2. Spielberg v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  3. Marine v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  4. Hazout v. Tsang Mun TingSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WagamonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API