Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the circuit court of Warren county. Hon. John N. Bush, Judge. Johnson, the appellant, was plaintiff in the court below and the railroad company, appellee, was defendant there. From a judgment in defendant’s favor predicated of a peremptory instruction the plaintiff appealed to the supreme court. The action was for recovery of damage for personal injury alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence. The opinion of the court states the facts.

Read the full summary

From the circuit court of Warren county. Hon. John N. Bush, Judge. Johnson, the appellant, was plaintiff in the court below and the railroad company, appellee, was defendant there. From a judgment in defendant’s favor predicated of a peremptory instruction the plaintiff appealed to the supreme court. The action was for recovery of damage for personal injury alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence. The opinion of the court states the facts. The conduct of complainant in walking out on the platform was not contributory negligence as a matter of law. Dougherty v. Yazoo, etc., R.…

1Opinion of the Court

Mates, J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

On the 10th clay of August, 1907, Samuel Johnson took passage on the Tazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad for the purpose of going from Merigold to Vicksburg. The train on which he embarked was a fast train, commonly called the “Cannon Ball,” and vestibuled throughout. The train was a night train, and due at Vicksburg about 12:40 a. m. It seems that after the train whistled for Vicksburg the porter passed through the car where Johnson was, carrying with him a box of some kind, which he placed on the platform, and himself returned inside. After this…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Willis v. . Long Island Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Graham v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Watkins v. Birmingham Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  5. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. McGowanMississippi Supreme Court · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BattleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Louisville Nashville R.R. Co. v. HutchersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API