Legal Opinion
Huston v. Cobleigh
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 14, 1911No. 2072PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error from District Court, Washington County; T. L. Brown, Judge. Action between E. B. Huston and others and John C. Cob-leigh. From the judgment, Huston and others bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Counsel for plaintiffs in error in their brief say:
“The facts, as disclosed by the pleadings, raise several propositions, but we believe they are ultimately resolved into one; that is, Did the United States Court for the Northern District of the Indian Territory, sitting at Pryor Creek, have the power to decree the execution of a valid oil and gas mining lease upon the allotment of Agnes B. Henry, she being a minor Cherokee citizen, for a period extending beyond the minority of the allottee?”
It is contended by counsel for plaintiffs in error that said court was sitting in the exercise of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morrison v. BurnetteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Marsh v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Ricardi v. GabouryTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
- Emerson v. . SpicerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Branton v. BrantonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1861
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cabin Valley Mining Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Cowles v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Mallen v. Ruth Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1915
- Clay v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Mallen v. Ruth Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.