Legal Opinion

Basf Corp. v. Jafbros, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1989No. 19086PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Barrett Paint Supply sold respondent Jafbros, Inc. a paint mixing system. Jafbros made the down payment and failed to pay the remaining balance. Barrett then filed a complaint against Jafbros for money allegedly owed.

Jafbros filed its answer, counterclaim and cross-claim against third-party defendants Glasurit and Glasurit/Limco. Appellant Basf Corporation, Inmont Division, used Glasurit as a trade name. Subsequently, Jafbros filed an amended third-party cross-claim against Basf. Since Basf, a foreign corporation, had no agent, cashier or secretary within Nevada, Jafbros served the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jenkins v. GoldwaterNevada Supreme Court · 1968

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michel v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API