Legal Opinion
McCarthy v. American Thread Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
Decided January 17, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions
At Law. On motion of defendant concerning costs.
1Opinion of the Court
LANNING, District Judge.
The defendant is a corporation and citizen of New Jersey, but has its manufacturing plant in Connecticut. The plaintiff is a minor and a resident of Connecticut, and was injured in the factory of the defendant while engaged in its service. This suit was brought by her for the recovery of damages resulting from the injury. The jury awarded her $100. The defendant now moves that the plaintiff be required, under the provisions of section 968 of the Revised Statutes of the United States [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 702], to pay to the defendant its costs. That section is as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Wetmore v. RymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Gordon v. LongestSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Green v. LiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
- Put-In-Bay Waterworks Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Evans v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1913
- Chesapeake Transit Co. v. MottCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909