Legal Opinion

Put-In-Bay Waterworks Co. v. Ryan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 13, 1901No. 332PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCÜIT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. ’ Ik September, 1892, the Electric Supply Company, a corporation and citizen of the State of Connecticut, filed in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio a bill of complaint against the Put-in-Bay Waterworks, Light and Pailway Company, a corporation and citizen of the State of Ohio.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCÜIT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. ’ Ik September, 1892, the Electric Supply Company, a corporation and citizen of the State of Connecticut, filed in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio a bill of complaint against the Put-in-Bay Waterworks, Light and Pailway Company, a corporation and citizen of the State of Ohio. It was alleged in the bill that the ■ plaintiff company had, in June, 1872, sold and delivered to the defendant company certain materials and supplies to be used in the erection of the lighting apparatus, powerhouse,…

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Justioe Shikas,

after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The contention in the brief on behalf of the appellant, that “ by the service- of the writ of replevin issued from the state court the property came into the custody and possession of that court for all purposes of jurisdiction in that case, and no other court had a right to interfere with that possession except a court having a direct supervisory control over the court issuing the writ, or some superior jurisdiction in the premises, the state court having placed the property in the possession of the officers of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Krippendorf v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Wetmore v. RymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Clarke v. MathewsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1838

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Maurel v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1915
  3. Kawin & Co. v. American Colortype Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
  4. Miller-Crenshaw Co. v. Colorado Mill & Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  5. Brown v. United Gas Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API