Legal Opinion

People v. Cherry

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided August 25, 2017Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Defendant was charged with violating Agriculture and Markets Law § 353. The pertinent part of the accusatory instrument states as follows:

“THE DEPONENT STATES THAT, AT THE ABOVE TIME AND PLACE, DEPONENT OBSERVED TWO PITBULLS IN THE BACKYARD OF DEFENDANT’S RESIDENCE, THAT DEPONENT OBSERVED SAID DOGS TO HAVE SORES ON THE PELVIC AREA, EXTREMELY EMACIATED, PROMINENT RIBS, SPINE, PELVIC BONES, EXAGGERATED HOUR GLASS TORSOS, AND FOOD AND WATER BOWLS TO BE EMPTY AND RUSTED.
“DEPONENT IS FURTHER INFORMED BY DEFENDANT’S…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. BrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. People v. RomanoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API