Legal Opinion
Woodmansee v. Lowery
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1959No. Civ. 23601; Civ. 23602PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Each of the petitioners in the above entitled proceedings seeks a writ of mandate directed to the respondent county auditor-controller of the county of Los Angeles directing him to draw and pay the salary warrant of each of said petitioners as judge of the Municipal Court of the Los Angeles Judicial District, each claiming to be the lawful incumbent of the same judicial office in said court.
On and prior to the 28th day of October 1958 the petitioner Woodmansee was the duly qualified, elected and acting judge of the Justice Court of the Malibu Judicial District. On that date there…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People ex rel. Ryder v. MiznerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- People ex rel. Madden v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Klose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People Ex Rel. Mattison v. NyeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- People ex rel. Wetherbee v. CazneauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by27 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. WeidertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Eldridge v. Sierra View Local Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- State Board of Education v. HonigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Van Nuis v. Los Angeles Soap Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.