Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1968No. 36721PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

In a joint jury trial, defendant Foster and Cleon Montgomery were convicted of robbery. They were represented by the same counsel and we reversed the judgment as to Montgomery (State v. Montgomery, 182 Neb. 737, 157 N. W. 2d 196), because of denial of effective counsel stemming from Foster’s confession implicating Montgomery and error in failing to grant severance.

Foster claims his confession was involuntary and should not have been admitted because of inadequate foundation for voluntariness. The affirmative evidence supporting the finding of voluntariness must show the confession was freely…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. State v. LongmoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Parker v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. LongNebraska Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. TempleNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. NanceNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. NanceNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API