Legal Opinion

Barfield v. Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided April 10, 2018No. 2:11-cv-04321Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION CHASE BARFIELD, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:11-cv-04321-NKL ) SHO-ME POWER ELECTRIC ) COOPERATIVE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER On March 31, 2014, the Court ruled that Defendants, Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative (“Sho-Me Power”) and Sho-Me Technologies (“Sho-Me Tech”), were both liable for crossing the class members’ land to operate their commercial telephone business without first obtaining commercial telecommunications easements from the landowners. Doc. 396. It found liability based on both…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Lee Browning v. President Riverboat Casino-Missouri, Inc., Lee Browning v. President Riverboat Casino-Missouri, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. Beetschen v. Shell Pipe Line Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Beetschen v. Shell Pipe Line CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Riggs v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API