Legal Opinion
Cressey v. Cressey
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 27, 1912PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRtjgg, C. J.
This case is not before us properly. It is a petition for partition. A hearing was had before a judge of the Superior Court,* who filed a careful statement of the whole case and of his conclusions, entitled “Findings by the Court.” This was a finding of the material facts and his rulings of law upon them. Its concluding words were “Interlocutory judgment to be entered in accordance with the foregoing findings.” But no such judgment has been entered. Two of the respondents appealed “from the findings of the court . . . and . . . from the conclusions of the .court as expressed in said finding,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cohen v. NagleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Lopes v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Hutchins v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Lowd v. BrighamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Cotter v. Nathan & Hurst Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Swan v. Justices of Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Weil v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Check v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.