Legal Opinion

McDermott v. Woodhouse

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 17, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On motion to strike out bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Backes, Y. G.

This-is a motion to strike out a bill for want of jurisdiction. The object of the bill, is to recover unpaid stock subscriptions of an insolvent foreign corporation by a receiver appointed by this court. The objection to the bill is that such proceedings can *125onty be taken, in tlie domicile of tlie corporation and by a receiver there appointed.

The bill discloses this state of facts: The Lakewood City Development Company, a New York corporation, was declared insolvent by this court, and the complainant was appointed receiver. The company was formed under the laws of the State of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Whitman v. Oxford National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Flash v. ConnSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Howarth v. . AngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Stoddard v. . LumNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atwater v. BaskervilleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
  2. Cogswell v. StoutNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1880
  3. Bentley v. ColgateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  4. Vanorden v. JohnsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1862
  5. Woodward v. WoodwardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API