Legal Opinion

Cogswell v. Stout

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On petition, order to show canse and affidavits.

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor,.

This is' an application to open a final decree in order that a defendant may be let in to defend. The applicant is *241Sarah Hagaman. The equity upon which she desires tfl resist the complainant’s right to relief is, that after part of the premises covered by the mortgage in suit had been conveyed to her, the complainant, with notice of her rights, released other portions of the mortgaged premises, and thereby deprived her of her right to compel resort first, and in exoneration of the part owned by her, to the parts released, for the payment of the mortgage debt. The rule is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cheesebrough v. MillardNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  2. Taylor's Executors v. MarisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
  3. DuBois v. WatermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916
  4. McDermott v. WoodhouseNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mann v. BugbeeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. Ocean Cty. Nat. Bk. v. J. Edwin Ellor SonsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  3. ROSEMONT PROPERTIES, LLC VS. IP REALTY, LLC (F-022911-15, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API