Hoyt v. Chapin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Lake county to determine the adverse claims of defendants to vacant and unoccupied land. The case was tried before Ensign, J., who found that the title to the premises was vested in defendant Arthur B. Chapin and that plaintiff had no interest therein. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
Action to determine adverse claims to a tract of vacant land in Lake county. Under the issues as presented by the pleadings, Arthur B. Chapin held the title in fee to a part of the property, unless devested by proceedings to enforce the payment of taxes for the year 1890, delinquent on the first Monday in January, 1892, and its sale by the state as forfeited, under G-. S. 1894, § 1616. The trial court found that defendant Chapin was owner in fee of an undivided portion of the premises, which were unoccupied; that plaintiff claims adverse title thereto, but that such claims “of said-plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kipp v. DawsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Security Trust Co. v. HeyderstaedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Cole v. LammSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- London & Northwest American Mortgage Co. v. GibsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
3Cited by13 opinions
- Independent-Consolidated School District No. 27 v. WaldronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- O'Neil v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
- Chadbourne v. HartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- National Bond & Security Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Sterling v. UrquhartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.