Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Common Council

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1906No. Calendar No. 21,375PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mandamus by Adolph Johnson to compel the common council of the city of Bessemer to approve a liquor bond.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Mandamus is sought to require the respondent to approve a liquor bond presented to respondent by relator. Approval was refused upon the ground that by an ordinance of the city the relator had no *314right to engage in the business contemplated at the place named in the bond. But two questions require consideration : First, whether the charter of the city authorized the common council to restrict the saloon business to a particular locality; second, whether such restriction has been provided by a valid ordinance.'

1. Subdivision 14 of chapter 11 of the act for the incorporation of cities of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Magneau v. City of FremontNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Sherlock v. StuartMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. City of Detroit v. Fort Wayne & Belle Isle Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Bowman v. St. JohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Timm v. Common Council of Caledonia StationMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Quay v. Cheboygan Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API