Legal Opinion

McGuckin v. Keystone Dye & Metal Works

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided June 9, 1937No. 2548Published

1Opinion of the Court

Levinthal, J.,

In this case the Workmen’s Compensation Board awarded the minor claimant double compensation on the ground that the employment was in violation of the provisions of the Child Labor Law.

It is admitted by the employer that claimant was under 18 years of age when employed and when the accident occurred, and it is conceded that the employer failed to comply with section 8 of the Child Labor Law of May 13, 1915, *557P. L. 286, amended by the Act of July 19, 1935, P. L. 1335, which provides:

“Before any minor under eighteen years of age shall be employed, permitted or suffered to work in,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. McClain v. LockeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  4. Paul Gima v. the Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Krutlies v. Bulls Head Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API