Legal Opinion
Dunning Construction Co. v. Franklin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 14, 1933No. 24730PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
This is an original action to review an award of the State Industrial Commission. The employer, Dunning Construction Company, and the insurance carrier, Aetna Life Insurance Company, are petitioners, and the claimant, A. N. Franklin, and State Industrial Commission are respondents.
On December 9, 1930, the claimant sustained an injury while in the employ of the Dunning Construction Company. On January ®, 1931, he filed a claim with the State Industrial Commission under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The insurance carrier voluntarily paid compensation to the claimant for a period of 104 weeks,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- White Oak Refining Co. v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Cosmos Mining Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Fursman Coal Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Blackstock Oil Co. v. MurtishawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Harris Meat & Produce Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Sheffield Steel Corporation v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Carrico v. City of MiamiCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990