Legal Opinion

Slayton v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided June 24, 2003No. 1913022PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELSEY, Judge.

The trial court found the appellant, Adrian Edwardo Slay-ton, guilty of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute (Code § 18.2-248) and possession of a firearm while simultaneously possessing illegal drugs (Code § 18.2-308.4(A)). On appeal, Slayton challenges only the trial court’s denial of his pretrial suppression motion. Finding no error, we affirm the trial court.

I

“On appeal from a denial of a suppression motion, we must review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, giving it the benefit of any reasonable inferences.” Barkley v. Commonwealth, 39…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Logan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  2. Glenn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  3. Tizon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
  4. Joyce v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
  5. Najee Finique Hairston v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API