McHugh v. North Carolina Department of Environmental, Health & Natural Resources
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McGEE, Judge.
Petitioner contends the trial court erred in upholding DEHNR’s final agency decision. Specifically, petitioner argues the record contains insufficient evidence to support a violation of the SPCA and the agency erred as a matter of law in assessing the civil penalty. The proper standard for the superior court’s judicial review of a final agency decision “depends upon the particular issues presented on appeal.” Act-Up Triangle v. Commission for Health Services, 345 N.C. 699, 706, 483 S.E.2d 388, 392 (1997); Amanini v. N.C. Dept. of Human Resources, 114 N.C. App. 668, 674, 443…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Amanini v. N.C. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- ACT-UP Triangle v. Commission for Health ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- In re the Appeal by McCraryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Walker v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Applewood Properties, LLC v. New South Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Williams v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Hensley v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Applewood Properties, LLC v. New South Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Applewood Properties, LLC v. New South Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.