Legal Opinion

McHugh v. North Carolina Department of Environmental, Health & Natural Resources

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1997No. COA96-98PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Judge.

Petitioner contends the trial court erred in upholding DEHNR’s final agency decision. Specifically, petitioner argues the record contains insufficient evidence to support a violation of the SPCA and the agency erred as a matter of law in assessing the civil penalty. The proper standard for the superior court’s judicial review of a final agency decision “depends upon the particular issues presented on appeal.” Act-Up Triangle v. Commission for Health Services, 345 N.C. 699, 706, 483 S.E.2d 388, 392 (1997); Amanini v. N.C. Dept. of Human Resources, 114 N.C. App. 668, 674, 443…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Amanini v. N.C. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. ACT-UP Triangle v. Commission for Health ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  4. In re the Appeal by McCraryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Walker v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Applewood Properties, LLC v. New South Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Williams v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Hensley v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Applewood Properties, LLC v. New South Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Applewood Properties, LLC v. New South Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API