Legal Opinion

Mineola Mack Distributors, Inc. v. Huntington Fleet Service, Inc.

New York District Court

Decided May 13, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John Di Noto, J.

Plaintiff’s motion for an order to dismiss defendant’s demand for a trial de novo is granted. The clerk of the court is directed to disregard the demand for trial de novo and strike the case from the Trial Calendar.

A demand for a trial de novo may be made by any party *19who was not in default at the compulsory arbitration hearing. (22 NYCRR 28.12.) A corporation is in default where it is not represented by an attorney at a civil proceeding. (CPLR 321 [a].) The objection to a corporation appearing in person is that it is not a natural person and it must act…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Austrian, Lance & Stewart, P. C. v. Hastings Properties, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lohmann v. Castleton Gallery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Pere v. 1470-1488 U&R Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API