Mineola Mack Distributors, Inc. v. Huntington Fleet Service, Inc.
New York District Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John Di Noto, J.
Plaintiff’s motion for an order to dismiss defendant’s demand for a trial de novo is granted. The clerk of the court is directed to disregard the demand for trial de novo and strike the case from the Trial Calendar.
A demand for a trial de novo may be made by any party *19who was not in default at the compulsory arbitration hearing. (22 NYCRR 28.12.) A corporation is in default where it is not represented by an attorney at a civil proceeding. (CPLR 321 [a].) The objection to a corporation appearing in person is that it is not a natural person and it must act…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Austrian, Lance & Stewart, P. C. v. Hastings Properties, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lohmann v. Castleton Gallery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Pere v. 1470-1488 U&R Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998