Legal Opinion

United States v. Hall

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided February 5, 2001No. ACM 33476PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

YOUNG, Chief Judge:

In accordance with his pleas, the appellant was convicted of two specifications of assault and one specification of failure to obey an order. Articles 128 and 92, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. *790§§ 928, 892. Contrary to his plea, the appellant was convicted of wrongful distribution of a controlled substance. Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. The convening authority approved the sentence adjudged by the court members: confinement for 12 months and reduction to E-1. The appellant claims the military judge erred by denying “the defense the right to call a material…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. ToroUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. Perez PerezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. WhittleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  2. United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  3. United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API