State v. Williams
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s overruling of his objection to arraignment and deferral of his motion for a bill of particulars to the judge who was scheduled to preside at defendant’s trial. He complains that he was “prejudiced in preparation of his defense and preparation for trial” because the indictment did not properly inform him as to whether he was being prosecuted for first or second degree murder.
It is well settled in North Carolina that the State is not generally required to elect its theory of prosecution in a murder case before trial. State…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. EasterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. CasperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. TannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. RayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014