Legal Opinion
Richardson v. U. S. F. & G. Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1958No. 40786PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillespie, J.
This appeal involves the extent of the subrogation rights of the compensation carrier to the proceeds of a judgment against a third-party wrongdoer under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The facts are not in dispute.
Charles Zack Richardson (claimant) was gravely injured in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with Clinch Drilling Company (employer). In due course, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (carrier) began paying compensation benefits under the Mississippi Workmen’s Compensation Act, including weekly compensation of $25.00 per week and…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Smith Petroleum Service, Inc. v. Monsanto Chemical Company, Monsanto Chemical Company v. Smith Petroleum Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Brocker Manufacturing & Supply Co. v. MashburnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Castro v. BassNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Bilodeau v. Oliver Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WeeksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.