Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Diffoot

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 20, 2000No. 99-0570/MCPublished

1Dissent

COX, Senior Judge, with whom CRAWFORD, Chief Judge,

joins (dissenting):

I disagree that the purpose of trial counsel’s closing argument was to urge conviction on the basis of Hispanic ethnicity or guilt by association. Therefore, I dissent.

The question of the effect of improper prosecution argument was addressed by the Supreme Court in Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 94 S.Ct. 1868, 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974), and in Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168, 106 S.Ct. 2464, 91 L.Ed.2d 144 (1986). Applying these cases, the question is whether trial counsel’s argument “so infected the trial with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. LawrenceNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API