Legal Opinion

Ex parte Donovan

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 22, 2017No. WR-75,582-03PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Alcala, J., filed a concurring opinion.

I join this Court's decision in denying habeas relief to David M. Donovan, applicant. As the habeas court determined, applicant has failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that he would have gone to trial instead of resolving this case through a plea bargain had he been properly admonished about the sex-offender registration requirement. I write separately to address my reasons for participating in the instant decision rather than sua sponte recusing myself.

I. Background

In 1998, applicant pleaded no contest to aggravated sexual assault of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. Thomas A. Burger, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Inc., Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Donovan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Gaal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. in Re Hidalgo County Criminal District Attorney Ricardo Rodriguez and Juan Villescas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API