Legal Opinion

Miracle Boot Puller Co. v. Plastray Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1978No. Docket 26913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. F. Cavanagh, J.

We cannot agree with our brother Bronson’s disposition of the troublesome question of jurisdiction involved herein.

Our brother begins his analysis by conceding that:

"While this [Court’s previous] holding assumes that a state court has jurisdiction over such a conversion claim, the Court never so determined; the specific issue of jurisdiction was never raised nor addressed.3 (Emphasis added.)

Yet, a few paragraphs later he states:

"Thus, as we held that plaintiff’s claim arose under state law, state courts had jurisdiction over the claim.” (Emphasis added.)

The prior decision never held that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Warren Tool Co. v. StephensonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Allen v. DuffieMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Utah-Nevada Co. v. De LamarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
  4. Tuuk v. AndersenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Miracle Boot Puller Co. v. Plastray Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grimes v. HaslettAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Chavez v. KincaidDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1998
  3. Brass Metal Products, Inc. v. E-J Enterprises Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. JACOBS WIND ELEC. v. Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. Matomco Oil Co. v. Arctic Mechanical, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API