Legal Opinion

Sera v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 25, 2000No. CR 98-1222PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENSKI R. SMITH, Justice.

Appellant, Steven Anthony Sera appeals stice. eight criminal counts related to three sexual encounters involving the use of the drug Rohypnol with two women in Monticello, Arkansas. Sera raises five points on appeal, including challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence, the trial court’s admission of evidence under Ark. R. Evid. 404(b), the constitutionality of the Arkansas Rape Shield Statute, the admission of certain expert testimony, and the admission of a videotape depicting three sexual encounters involving Sera and three different apparently unconscious…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Misskelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Thomas Polk v. Ford Motor Company, Ethel Lee Marshall, Guardian v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. ACW, INC. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Sanford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Fudge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. State v. NunesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API