Brooks v. Hilton Casinos Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge,
concurring and dissenting Nos. 90-15424, 90-15460 and 90-15623
The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to present a jury question regarding an implied contract of employment between the Las Vegas Hilton and its 37 fired employees. Because it misconstrues Nevada law in resolving this issue, the majority dismisses categorically several types of evidence which the jury properly considered. The majority also mischaracterizes the evidence consisting of Hilton’s numerous assurances to plaintiffs that they would be terminated only…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Schulz v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- K Mart Corp. v. PonsockNevada Supreme Court · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.