Legal Opinion

People v. Perretta

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 1930PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.

The actions are each brought to recover a penalty of $100 on the ground that defendant carried on the business of conducting a milk-gathering station or plant without a license, in violation of section 252 of the Agriculture and Markets Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 69).

Each complaint states a cause of action in proper form but the defendant challenges the constitutionality of the law requiring him to obtain a license, on the ground that it denies to him the equal protection of the law and deprives him of his liberty without due process of law, contrary to the guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. New York Ex Rel. Bryant v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. People v. GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Matter of Elite Dairy Products v. Ten EyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. People v. NebbiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Gospel Army v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API