McGaughey v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
We find it necessary to reverse and remand this cause for a new trial. The two issues which require reversal concern double jeopardy and the separation of the jury.
McGaughey argues her Fifth Amendment protection against double jeopardy has been violated because she was found guilty of two offenses: battery with a deadly weapon and battery resulting in serious bodily injury. Ind.Code 35-42-2-1(3) was the basis for the two counts of battery. This section provides:
A person who knowingly or intentionally touches another person in a rude, insolent, or angry manner commits battery,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Bales v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stewart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Brackens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Drake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Eubank v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Follrad v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.