Legal Opinion

Francis v. O'NEAL

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 4, 1953No. 16875PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

Gus Francis, to whom we hereinafter refer as plaintiff, brought an action for damages which he alleged he suffered as the result of an assault and battery on him by H. E. O’Neal, hereinafter designated as defendant.

Upon issues joined by defendant’s answer, trial was to a jury which resolved the issues in favor of the plaintiff and assessed his actual damages in the sum of $1,-750.00. Judgment was entered on the verdict. Defendant moved for a new trial, and in ruling upon this motion the trial Judge said:

“So far as the verdict is concerned, the damages were not excessive, it was not only the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mooney v. CarterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  2. Scott v. MatsudaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  3. Clifford v. Denver, S. P. & P. R.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  4. Ullman v. McCormicSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  5. Chapin v. GoodellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Southerland v. Argonaut Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Sunahara v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  3. Freedman v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Cook Investment Co. v. Seven-Eleven Coffee Shop, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Citicorp Acceptance Co., Inc. v. SittnerColorado Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API