In re Treadwell
California Supreme Court
Proceeding for the disbarment of an attorney. The foots are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
This is an original proceeding to disbar an, attorney at law for misconduct in office, in fraudulently appropriating to his own use moneys collected by him for his client.. The record shows that Carl Haneke had employed the attorney in a transaction which involved the sale and transfer of a tract of land in Yolo County, to one Isaac Quinn. Quinn gave his promissory note for the purchase money of the land, payable in the sum of $2,450, and interest thereon from date of the note, payable quarterly in advance, to Haneke at the Bank of Cali*354fornia, and secured its payment by a mortgage trust deed…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Matter of DanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- In re OWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Ex parte TylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In Re MorgansternCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- In re BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.