Legal Opinion

Cammack v. Floyd

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1855PublishedCited by 2 opinions

from the Fourth District Court of New Orleans. Reynolds, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSlidell, C. J.

The fund in dispute is a sum of $1300, in the hands of the garnishees, Turner, Wilson & Co. The plaintiffs, creditors of Floyd, claim it under an attachment and process of garnishment levied in March, 1853. The interven, ors claim it as holders of a hill of exchange accepted by Floyd, for the payment of which, they say the fund had received a destination placing it beyond Floyd’s control before the attachment. The fund was awarded to the intervenors by the court below, and the attaching creditor has appealed.

A brief statement of the circumstances under which the garnishees hold the fund, will…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sintes v. CommerfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. Holmes & Barnes v. Shawnee Milling Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API