Legal Opinion

State v. Daniel Chernobieff

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2016No. Docket 44259PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. Jones, Chief Justice

Daniel Chernobieff appeals the denial of his motion to suppress the results of a war- rantless blood draw. Following the magistrate court’s denial of the motion, Cherno-bieff entered a conditional guilty plea. On appeal, the district court affirmed the magistrate court’s denial of the motion to suppress. Chernobieff timely appealed.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On September 11, 2018, at around 11:00 p.m., Idaho State Police Corporal Matthew Sly responded to a request for assistance from another officer who had pulled Cherno-bieff over in a traffic stop. Upon arrival, Corporal Sly noticed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. State v. Micah Abraham WulffIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. DonatoIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. LuteIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. PhippsIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. OchoaIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Marsalis v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. RossIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API