Legal Opinion

United States v. Griswold, Richmond & Glock Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 2, 1937No. 3732Published

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

This is a suit by the government to collect from a corporate taxpayer and its surety the obligation on a bond given to the plaintiff by the defendants under the authority of section 274(k) of the Revenue Act of 1926 (44 Stat. 55), as a condition to the granting of an extension of time within which to pay a deficiency in tax and interest due by the defendant taxpayer for the calendar year 1920. The bond in suit was given in place of a previous bond, for a further extension of time, which was definitely fixed at one year from October 7, 1931, expiring October 7, 1932. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. John Barth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Greylock Mills v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  4. Bank of Commerce v. RoseDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API