Detroit Club v. State of Michigan
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The judgments should be affirmed.
The provisions carried over from the old act operate wholly under the new act and not the old one. The act of 1943 speaks too plain to admit of judicial construction. It specifically lifted the time element in the former act by the proviso:
"That claim or notice of intention of filing any claim which has accrued prior to the effective date of this amendatory act may be filed within one year after the effective date thereof."
It is true the same proviso was in the former act, but we are confined to consideration of the act as it now stands and its operative…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. LowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rookledge v. GarwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Ballog v. Knight Newspapers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Minty v. Board of State AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. QuimbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Benson v. State Hospital CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.