Commonwealth v. Lee
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentBender, J.
• ¶ 11 respectfully dissent.
¶ 2 Appellant asserted in a post-sentencing motion that his sentence was excessive. Under Pennsylvania’s sentencing scheme, which requires the imposition of a minimum and a maximum term of incarceration, Appellant was sentenced to 15 to 96 months’ incarceration. Appellant did not contend that the 15 month minimum sentence was excessive, but did contend that the 96 month maximum sentence was. Pennsylvania, of course, is an indeterminate-sentencing state, meaning that a convicted individual is sentenced to a range of imprisonment, not a definite term, and that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Rogers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. KittrellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Mickens-Thomas v. Commonwealth, Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.