Legal Opinion

Erslon v. Cusumano

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1985No. 48591PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAERTNER, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order sustaining the motion of two of three defendants to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. We dismiss the appeal as premature.

Plaintiffs are the trustees of the Cement Masons Local 527 Health and Welfare Fund and General American Life Insurance Company, the insurer for the union fund. Defendants are Frank J. Cusumano, VeeJay Cement Contracting Company and its insurer, Maryland Casualty Company.

In a single count plaintiffs’ petition alleges that Cusumano was an employee of VeeJay and a participant in the disability and medical benefit…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Weir Ex Rel. Weir v. BruneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Best v. SchoemehlMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Shell v. ShellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Lipton Realty, Inc. v. St. Louis Housing AuthorityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Klippel v. WatkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gibson v. BrewerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Speck v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Erslon v. Vee-Jay Cement Contracting Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Blechle v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Gunter v. City of St. JamesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API