Legal Opinion
Reisler v. Forsyth
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 20, 1937No. 5838PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, District Judge.
Complainant, a resident of the state of New York, brings this proceeding as a holder of bonds of the City of Asbury Park, N. J., in the amount of $4,000. He contends (a) that chapter 160, Laws of New Jersey of 1936, N.J.St.Annual 1936, § *136 — 4700(416) et Seq., creating . the Beach Commission, violates the due process clause of the Federal Constitution, and (b) that it impairs the obligations of his contract as a bondholder.
The act provides that in a municipality under control of the Municipal Finance Commission and which shall own the beach and upland contiguous thereto…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hill v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Amusement Syndicate Co. v. El Paso Land Improvement Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1918
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
- Hetrick v. RobertsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Hetrick v. RobertsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stenger v. Stenger Broadcasting CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Johnson v. Radio Station Wow, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945