Legal Opinion
Stenger v. Stenger Broadcasting Corporation
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 31, 1939No. 166PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, District Judge.
This is a motion by defendants to dismiss the action, and to discharge a rule to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be granted.
The following are the essential facts: John H. Stenger, Jr., the plaintiff, holds a license from the Federal Communications Commission to operate radio broadcasting station WBAX, ■ located at Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.
The plaintiff has executed certain contracts whereby he has promised to assign his license to the defendants, subject to the approval of the Federal Communications Commission, and whereby he has agreed with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Amusement Syndicate Co. v. El Paso Land Improvement Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1918
- Reisler v. ForsythDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1937
3Cited by6 opinions
- Toledo, P. & W. R. R. v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Regents of New Mexico College of Agriculture & Mechanic Arts v. Albuquerque Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Themy v. Seagull Enterprises, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
- Nelson v. LeightonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1949
- Johnson v. Radio Station Wow, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.