Legal Opinion

Preddice v. Callanan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 30, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harvey, J.

The primary issue raised on this appeal is whether reinstatement and back pay are appropriate remedies for a provisional employee whose services have been determined by a jury to have been terminated in bad faith. In September 1975, petitioner received a temporary appointment as a probation communications consultant with the State Division of Probation, a competitive class job title. He remained in this position until April 1978, when his title was changed to probation public information and media specialist, a contemplated noncompetitive class position. However,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holt v. County of TiogaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Wilborn v. StarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Ranus v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Preddice v. CallananAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Serowick v. BarryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mansell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. Local 2507 of District Council 37 of the American Federation of State, County, & Municipal EmployeesNew York Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API