Legal Opinion
Serowick v. Barry
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 17, 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from the dismissal of his petition seeking an order compelling respondent to reinstate him to his position as a State inspector at Finger Lakes Race Track. Petitioner served “during [the] pleasure” of respondent (see L 1973, ch 346, § 3; Racing and Wagering Board Law, § 201, subd 8) and had no right to review of his termination under section 75 of the Civil Service Law and no property interest in the continuation of his employment (see Bishop v Wood, 426 US 341; Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564, 578; Matter of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Codd v. VelgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Petix v. ConnelieNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of Stanziale v. Executive Dep't, Office of Gen. Servs.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by1 opinion
- Preddice v. CallananAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986