Legal Opinion

Judd v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 28, 2016No. 15-586CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se; Denial of Motion for Relief; RCFC 54(b); RCFC 60(b)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULES 54 AND 60

NANCY B. FIRESTONE, Senior Judge

Pending before the court is pro se plaintiff Keith Judd’s motion for relief, pursuant to Rule 54(b) and Rule 60(b) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), from this court’s October 30, 2015 order and judgment dismissing plaintiffs ease for lack of jurisdiction.

Plaintiff filed a complaint in this court on June 9, 2015 challenging the $200 felony-assessment fee and $20,000 fine he was required to pay following his 1999 conviction for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Norman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. James M. Patton and Joann Patton, Legal Guardians for Thomas Edward Patton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  4. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  5. Madison Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API