Cookendorfer v. Pendleton Co. Farmers Fire Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Van Sant, Commissioner
— Affirming.
Appellant is the holder of a policy issued by appellee insuring him against all direct loss or damage to his tobacco barn and three other buildings by fire, lightning, or wind, subject to certain limitations and conditions specifically set out therein. The one policy covers all four risks and the premium was paid in a lump sum.
One of the provisions in the policy recites “* * * also that the company will not be responsible for loss or damage by fire to dwellings or other buildings having terra cotta or clay flues in same, nor where stove…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Niagara Fire Insurance Co. v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Pearlstine v. Westchester Fire Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- Glens Falls Insurance Company v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Home Fire Insurance v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hanover Insurance Company v. McLoneyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1962
- Redding v. Independent Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
- Westchester Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
- Stearns Coal & Lumber Co. v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- West v. Whitley Lodge No. 148 of Knights of PythiasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.