Zagorski v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, J.
We granted this post-conviction appeal to determine whether there is ineffective assistance of counsel where, at the express instruction of a competent and fully informed defendant, defense counsel does not investigate or present mitigating evidence at the sentencing phase of a capital trial. For the reasons provided herein, we hold that there is not.
BACKGROUND
The petitioner, Edmund Zagorski, was convicted in 1984 of the first degree premeditated murders of John Dale Dotson and Jimmy Porter. The evidence at trial was that petitioner lured the two men into a wooded area in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Goad v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Givens v. Mullikin Ex Rel. McElwaneyTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Soto v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. KiserTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HoltonTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.