Legal Opinion

Zagorski v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1998No. 01S01-9711-CC-00240PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARKER, J.

We granted this post-conviction appeal to determine whether there is ineffective assistance of counsel where, at the express instruction of a competent and fully informed defendant, defense counsel does not investigate or present mitigating evidence at the sentencing phase of a capital trial. For the reasons provided herein, we hold that there is not.

BACKGROUND

The petitioner, Edmund Zagorski, was convicted in 1984 of the first degree premeditated murders of John Dale Dotson and Jimmy Porter. The evidence at trial was that petitioner lured the two men into a wooded area in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Goad v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Givens v. Mullikin Ex Rel. McElwaneyTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Soto v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. KiserTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. HoltonTennessee Supreme Court · 2004

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API